Another homemade product for those who are bored at home
I needed a couple of antennas for digital, in places with “not the best reception”... I went shopping (this was before self-isolation
- if it’s relatively budget-friendly, then it’s complete G. The more expensive one looks decent, but how it works is questionable.
I decided to make something homemade. It was somehow awkward to “twist” an antenna from a piece of cable (although rumor has it it works) - I wanted something simple, but more decent and advanced
In fact, the one I made is not radically more complicated, but somehow more “solid” or something. And the results of its testing were very encouraging, so I decided to sketch out a short description of what and how, in case someone else finds it useful 
... even if my street cats have a “normal” antenna on their house, what can you do without an antenna?!
In the places described, I previously used home-made broadband log-periodic antennas, probably since the “beginning of perestroika.” They worked well in analog and not only on UHF, but “for some reason, digital was too tough for them.” I didn’t really delve into the essence of the reasons, I removed them and began to think about what to replace them with. Here is one of them, waiting for a place in the trash
A little history
In the early 60s of the last century, our compatriot Kharchenko K.P. developed a simple flat zigzag antenna with good characteristics.
Copyright certificate No. 138277 for an invention called “Band directional antenna” was issued to Konstantin Pavlovich Kharchenko in 1961 (according to his application dated June 16, 1960). In the same year, materials were published in the magazine “Radio” for repetition by radio amateurs.
The antenna is not critical to materials and dimensions during manufacturing, has a simple good match with the reduction cable, and it successfully combines multiple elements of a common-mode antenna array with a single feed point.
a brief description of
Every master knows that almost the entire volume of television broadcasting occurs in the UHF range. This trend is due to the economic side, since the antenna-feeder system of broadcasting stations is significantly simplified, and the need for regular highly qualified maintenance is reduced. In addition, multifunctional television transmitters cover almost all populated areas with their powerful signal, and a well-developed network ensures the delivery of programs to the most remote corners of the country.
Innovative systems have influenced the fact that the method of broadcasting radio waves in large cities has changed significantly. Common interference affects a high-quality UHF UHF antenna quite weakly, but high-rise buildings made of reinforced concrete act as specific mirrors that transform the signal several times and even cause its premature attenuation. Despite possible difficulties, there are many different television programs on the air, which cannot but please the end user.
Separately, it is worth noting the fact that experts have developed universal digital broadcasting. The DVB - T2 signal belongs to a special category. Digital television broadcasting is practically insensitive to interference, but if there is phase distortion or mismatch with the cable, the final picture can crumble into small squares even with a clean signal.
Theory and calculations
The described antenna, in theory, has a horizontal “figure-of-eight” radiation pattern and a relatively high gain, which can be further increased by using a reflector/reflector.
To obtain maximum gain on all channels, it is necessary to make an antenna approximately in the middle of the range between the multiplexes used.
Finding (for calculations) the frequencies of multiplexes used in your region is easy,
for example, a request like “dvb-t2 channel frequencies” + “Krasnodar”
I found something like this:
The middle, between “my” two multiplexes, is 700 MHz - we will calculate the antenna at this frequency.
As a basis for calculating the dimensions of the antenna, we take the drawing of its author
Calculate the wavelength: λ = 300 / f [m]
300/700 = 0.428m, approximately 43cm length of each side of the rhombus
λ/4
=43/4= 10.75
The total length of the material we need (11cm*8=88cm) is less than a meter. The distance between the reduction contacts, where we will solder the cable, is 10-12mm (the standard value for this antenna for frequencies below 900 MHz).
I will make a simple antenna, without a reflector, however, to further increase the gain of this antenna, it is quite possible to install it behind it
for example, from a metal mesh/grill, foil material or simply a metal plate. Its dimensions should be approximately 20 percent larger than the dimensions of the antenna and it should be located at a distance of ƛmax/7. For my case: wavelength (channel 39) 300/618, it turns out...49/7= that is, about 7cm
For those who are too lazy to do the calculations themselves
— you can use an online calculator, the results will differ only slightly from those I received. Here, for example, this one - here you immediately enter the frequencies of two multiplexes and get the dimensions of the antenna (without a reflector) Or another option, with a reflector - I really want to note that in the second option a slightly different calculation option is used, different from the author’s. An antenna with angles other than 90° is assumed and the reflector distance is calculated as λ/8
To make the antenna sheet, it is recommended to use aluminum or copper (copper is easily soldered) with a diameter of 3 mm and higher - the larger the diameter, the more broadband the antenna is. You can use tubes; the thickness of the walls is not important, since only the surface of the material is used (in fact, you can wrap any dielectric with foil to obtain the required material). However, in my opinion, the easiest way is to buy a meter of large-gauge copper wire at an electrical supply store.
All-wave
Log-periodic antenna MV-UHF
The development of broadband trap technology was a consequence of the trend towards expanding the frequency band and the use of wideband signals in radar. Hence the need for all-wave LPAs arose. The latter have successfully proven themselves in solving problems related to the need to continuously cover a wide frequency range with unchanged catcher characteristics throughout the entire operating range. Such requirements apply to antennas whose purpose is industrial or military use.
You may be interested in: How to connect a digital set-top box to your TV
All-wave LPAs are characterized by:
- wide frequency range;
- moderate dimensions, relative to other aircraft;
- high sensitivity.
Antenna assembly
Let's remove the insulation from a piece of wire one meter long.
I got a wire with a diameter of 4.5mm
The tools you will need are a vice and a hammer. Measure approximately 11cm each and bend at an angle of 90°
The end result is to get such a “geometric” figure
We cut off the excess and solder the ends. It should look something like this...
Solder the cable as shown in the photo.
We lay the cable along one side of the square and secure it with clamps. This arrangement of the cable is necessary for its coordination (there are different opinions, not everyone agrees with this statement).
When using a reflector, the antenna sheet at the extreme points of the squares can also be secured using metal stands, for example, soldered onto the remains of the same copper wire - there are points with zero potential (highlighted in green). In other places, fastening is allowed only through a dielectric.
Tests
And finally, a performance check and a rough
assessment of the quality of the resulting antenna.
In fact, everything is simple with the test - turn it on, it works! And to evaluate whether the game was “worth the candle,” let’s compare the parameters of the received signal from the manufactured antenna with the one I’m already using at the dacha, with a declared gain of 11dBi
The antenna is installed in the attic of a country house, at a distance of approximately 16 km from the tower.
Signal level: factory stationary antenna on the left / homemade on the right
At first glance, the difference is only 1% (95 versus 94) - but this is not a completely correct comparison, since my external antenna is connected through a splitter, which further weakens the signal.
Assessing the performance of the antenna
Let's try to make a more correct comparison by connecting through the splitter input.
Well, in addition, for clarity, let’s add the number of participants List of antennas taking part in the comparison:
1. External antenna Funke BM 4551 external long-range,
declared gain, from some sources (bought at Yulmart), up to 16dB
2. There is an old UHF loop antenna, from TV Electronica 313d, I must say, despite its simplicity, it’s a very good antenna, that’s why it’s been preserved
3. I went to the store and bought for comparison in the review one of the cheapest, such as a symmetrical vibrator (100% the most purchased by pensioners, due to the low price).
I will carry out all “measurements” at one point, located as close as possible to the external antenna - its location was experimentally selected based on the maximum signal, so we can say that the conditions are approximately the same
So, we have already seen the signal level from the external antenna at 95% (at the time of current measurements it showed 94%), we take it as a standard. All comparisons are made by connecting antennas to the input on the splitter, to which an external antenna is usually connected.
Loop antenna, from Electronics 82% on 39 multiplex and 66% on 60
Budget with “horns” - 62%/38% (on the verge of losing the broadcast)
Double square - 92% on both multiplexes, about a couple of percent less than the external one
Out of curiosity, I decided to check the work of the reflector, which is easy to make from any metal mesh, plate or even foil... It REALLY works noticeably! The level rose to 96%!, which is even higher than the stationary one, with a declared gain of 11dB.
The most interesting thing is the object that I used as a reflector!
There was no foil in the house; the only thing available with a metal surface of the required size was... a laptop cover (I have a metal case). But the main thing is the result! It’s clear that I’m not going to “tie” the laptop to the antenna, and its amplification is enough for me without a reflector
Main settings
Both outdoor and indoor UHF antennas must meet a number of characteristics. Only a high-quality product can provide the end consumer with a clear TV signal.
In addition, modern requirements for television antennas have changed significantly :
- Experts say that in most cases the range type of product is considered the most suitable; all necessary settings should be saved exclusively in automatic mode. Everything should depend solely on the territory of the location, and not on engineering tricks.
- The coefficients of directional and protective action should not have decisive values. This rule arose against the background of the fact that in modern air there is a lot of unnecessary stuff, which is why some kind of interference can pass along the side lobe of the diagram used. Such problems can only be dealt with using electronics.
- The amplitude-frequency response should be more even and stable. This rule is based on the fact that sharp jumps and dips will certainly lead to phase distortions.
- The antenna gain plays a special role. Experienced professionals know well that a product that can cover the entire airwaves provides an excellent reserve of power for the previously received signal. In addition, the equipment will be able to eliminate all signals and noise.
- The purchased TV antenna must be compatible with the cable in all its operating ranges without the use of additional units for balancing and matching.
All these points are relevant for both analogue and digital television.
Conclusion:
I can confidently recommend repeating it!
Simple, “cheap and tasty”... One of the simplest, indoor antenna mounts... with ordinary suction cups - if you’re lucky with the direction to the television center
The next antenna "recommended for repetition" is... log periodic
“Crazy hands” were with you. Good luck and good mood to everyone! ☕
